Kevin W. Miller is a registered patent attorney who focuses his practice on preparation and prosecution of patent applications in a variety of technological fields including software, hardware, machine learning, databases, logistics, cloud computing, social networking, fintech, and information security.
Prior to joining the firm, Kevin was an intellectual property associate at a San Jose, California-based law firm, where he focused his practice on patent counseling and protection in the hardware and software fields of computing.
While attending law school, Kevin worked in a range of legal settings including law firms, technology corporations, and university-sponsored legal clinics, where he worked to obtain intellectual property protections for a diverse base of local individuals and entities.
Kevin is an experienced programmer with extensive experience in languages and platforms including Java, C, C++, C#, OpenGL, XML, HTML, Unity, Unreal, Machine, and Excel. He is also active in the 3D-printing community as a designer and modder.
The Ohio State University B.S. (2015) Computer Science and Engineering
University of Wisconsin Law School J.D. (2018)
Wisconsin (2018)
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.
