Thomas Mathew is a registered patent attorney who focuses his practice on patent prosecution and counseling, primarily in the medical device field. He has considerable experience with U.S. and worldwide prosecution and large-scale patent diligence and counseling projects. He also has experience with patent litigation, having worked on claim construction and invalidity analyses and motions and briefs at trial and pre-trial stages.
While attending law school, Thomas served on the Board of the Texas Law Review as Managing Editor of the Law Review’s online companion publication and as President of the Asian Law Students Association. He was also an associate intern at a venture capital firm in Austin, Texas, where he reviewed numerous technology startups.
University of Texas School of Law, J.D. (2014) with honors, Dean’s Achievement Award, Texas Law Review, Online Content Managing Editor
University of Texas at Austin, B.S., Biomedical Engineering (2011)
University of Texas at Austin, B.A., Economics (2011)
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (2015)
San Francisco Immigration Court
Asian Pacific American Bar Association (APABA) of Silicon Valley, Finance & Development, Vice President
Community Legal Services in East Palo Alto (CLSEPA), Pro Bono Advisory Council, Member
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.