Alicia Grahn Jones concentrates her practice in the areas of trademark clearance, prosecution, global portfolio strategy, and trademark enforcement. Alicia specializes in strategic management of large global trademark portfolios, including counseling for international enforcement on infringement issues. Alicia manages global enforcement programs by creating strategy protection plans for brand owners. Alicia has managed disputes in more than 200 jurisdictions and successfully resolved numerous complex cross-jurisdictional disputes. Alicia also routinely assists clients with global clearance and filing programs for new brands. Alicia also has extensive experience representing clients before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
Alicia is a past President of the Board of Directors for the Georgia Association for Women Lawyers and also serves on the Board of Directors of the Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund. She was recognized in 2020 and 2021 by The Best Lawyers in America® for Trademark Law. Alicia was listed in the 2020 and the five immediately preceding editions of World Trademark Review 1000 – The World's Leading Trademark Professionals. Alicia has been repeatedly recognized as a Georgia "Super Lawyer". In 2020, she was named a "Next Generation Lawyer" by Legal 500 US for Non-Contentious Trademark Law. Alicia is a Co-Chair of the firm’s Women’s Initiative.
Represents Delta Air Lines, Inc. in connection with its global trademark portfolio, including enforcement, clearance, prosecution, and maintenance.
Represents US Soccer Federation in connection with the protection of its brands, including assisting with enforcement in Paris, France in advance of the United States Women’s National Team’s competition in the 2019 World Cup.
Represents a world famous social media company in connection with managing its global registry enforcement program.
Represented a California-based Fortune 500 multinational corporation that designs and manufactures consumer electronics and computer software products in trademark enforcement work, including lead counsel representation of client in multiple proceedings before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
Successfully represented Texas Tech University in litigation to protect its school colors and trademarks. The firm’s motion for summary judgment resulted in the court finding liability as a matter of law, and also awarding more than $3 million in damages and attorneys’ fees. Texas Tech Univ. v. Spiegelberg, 461 F. Supp. 2d 510 (N.D. Tex. 2006).
Successfully represented University of Kansas in a trial against JoeCollege.com, a retailer selling various apparel using colors and other indicia of the University. Obtained award of attorneys' fees. University of Kansas v. Larry Sinks, et al., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23765 (D. Kan. 2008).
Insights View All
Emory University School of Law, J.D. (2004)
George Washington University, B.A., Political Science (1999) cum laude
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Georgia Supreme Court
Georgia Superior Court
Georgia Lower Courts
Leadership Atlanta, Class of 2021
Georgia Association for Women Lawyers, President (2016-2017)
Georgia Bar Association, Intellectual Property Section, Member
National Association of Collegiate Directors of Athletics, Member
Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund, Board of Directors
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.