Thomas Franklin focuses his practice on patent prosecution, licensing and intellectual capital management with more than 20 years of experience with intellectual property. He is experienced in intellectual property audits, due diligence and strategic planning processes. Through an IP Asset Management plan, he tailors strategy to business goals, competitive pressures and funding constraints to leverage intangible assets with intellectual property. He uses IP protection to maintain the dominance of large companies or assist smaller enterprises who are vying to dominate.
Mr. Franklin has been recognized by Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers for Business in 2021 and the five years immediately preceding as “a brilliant and intelligent attorney who knows IP law inside out.” He was listed by The Best Lawyers in America® in 2022 and the seven years immediately preceding for patent law. He was recognized as an “IP Star” in 2020 and the five years immediately preceding by Managing Intellectual Property magazine. In 2020, Mr. Franklin was recommended by Legal 500 US for Patent Prosecution. He is a recipient of the 2016 Client Choice Award USA & Canada from Lexology and the International Law Office. Mr. Franklin was recognized as a top patent practitioner in 2021 and the eight years immediately preceding by IAM Patent 1000. In 2020 and the three years immediately preceding, he was listed in the IAM Strategy 300: The World's Leading IP Strategists. Mr. Franklin was recognized as a Colorado “Super Lawyer” in 2021 and the seven years immediately preceding for intellectual property by Super Lawyers magazine. In 2020, he was selected by Law Week Colorado to its "Barrister’s Best" list as the "People’s Choice" for Best IP Non-Litigator. Mr. Franklin was named a Lawyer of the Year in 2012 by Law Week Colorado for the successful effort to bring a Regional Patent and Trademark Office to the Rocky Mountain Region in Denver to fulfill his vision of a nationwide workforce of the brightest and best examiners. The San Diego State University Alumni Association recognized and honored Mr. Franklin with the 2014 Distinguished Alumni Award from the College of Engineering.
Mr. Franklin's technical experience broadly covers the areas of software, health tech, blockchain, Internet technology, fintech, content delivery, business methods, clean technology, circuit design, imaging arrays, cryptographic design, telecommunications, electronic design tools, wireless communications, networking, and telemetry systems.
Prior to entering the field of law, Mr. Franklin spent nine years working in semiconductor fabrication facilities at the Naval Ocean Systems Center and Hughes Aircraft and several more as a senior engineer for Lockheed Martin. At Lockheed, he managed engineering projects involving the design of complex wireless data links, ASIC/FPGA design, digital circuits, satellite transponders, and encrypted data links.
Insights View All
University of San Diego School of Law J.D. (1997)
San Diego State University B.S. (1990) Electrical and Computer Engineering, summa cum laude
District of Columbia (2020)
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (1998)
U.S. Supreme Court
Colorado Bar Association, Member
San Diego State University, College of Engineering, Advisory Board Member
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.