Wes Butler focuses his practice on complex commercial litigation, transportation litigation, employment litigation and counseling and ERISA and bad faith litigation. In addition, Mr. Butler has an active commercial and general litigation docket, including a wide variety of tort claims. He represents parties in state and federal court litigation and arbitrations, and has represented creditors in the Northern and Eastern District of Texas Bankruptcy courts. He represents parties in administrative proceedings before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Texas Workforce Commission and other agencies. He has handled cases in the state and federal courts of Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Nebraska, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, South Carolina and Texas.
In addition to his litigation practice, Mr. Butler provides counseling and litigation avoidance on all areas of employment law including issues concerning claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the WARN Act, ERISA, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Family and Medical Leave Act, discrimination and sexual harassment, defamation in the workplace, negligent hiring, supervision and retention, covenants not-to-compete, employment contracts, and compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act. He also has experience drafting and implementing arbitration policies and nonsubscriber ERISA plans for employers.
Prior to joining the firm, Mr. Butler was a partner at a litigation law firm based in Dallas, Texas, where his practice included commercial, transportation, employment, tort, and ERISA/employee benefits litigation.
While attending law school, Mr. Butler was a member and articles editor of the SMU Law Review Association. He also served as a judicial intern in the 14th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas.
Mr. Butler was recognized as a Texas "Rising Star" in 2019 and the nine years immediately preceding and one of the “Up-and-Coming 100” in 2018 and 2019 by Super Lawyers magazine.
Insights View All
Southern Methodist University School of Law, J.D. (2004) cum laude
University of Virginia, B.A., Foreign Affairs (2001)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas (2004)
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (2006)
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas (2006)
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas (2006)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi (2017)
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi (2017)
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma (2017)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (2011)
American Bar Association, Member
State Bar of Texas, Member
Dallas Bar Association, Member
Arizona Bar Association, Member
Mississippi Bar Association, Member
Oklahoma Bar Association, Member
Dallas Regional Chamber, Member
Transportation Lawyers Association
Business Council for the Arts - Leadership Arts Institute 2017-2018 Class
KidLinks - Board Member
Greenland Hills Neighborhood Association - Board Member, Treasurer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.