Tuesday, February 19, 2019
This webinar will guide tax professionals and advisers on nexus limitations and protections for service providers in light of the Wayfair decision. The panel will discuss key challenges stemming from the economic presence test, nexus standards under the due process clause and commerce clauses, interstate income taxation, P.L. 86-272, and nexus protections available to service providers.
In South Dakota v. Wayfair, the United States Supreme Court abrogated the physical presence substantial nexus standard, leading more and more states to enact statutes providing for economic nexus sales tax thresholds similar to South Dakota’s.
Sellers of intangible property and online services must consider the impact of such laws on their operations, as they may easily exceed the thresholds in many states. Consideration should include the taxability of what they sell and constitutional defenses available under Public Law 86-272, Commerce Clause, and Due Process Clause.
Our panel will guide tax professionals and advisers on nexus limitations and protections for service providers in light of the Wayfair decision. The panel will discuss key challenges stemming from the economic presence test, nexus standards, taxability considerations, and potential defenses available to service providers.
I. Overview of the economic nexus test in Wayfair
II. Recent state tax law developments; economic nexus for sales tax, gross receipts taxes, and income tax
III. P.L. 86-272 protection for service providers
IV. Challenging state sales, income, and gross receipts taxation
A. Commerce clause
B. Due Process Clause
V. Best practices in limiting state sales and income tax liability for service providers
The panel will discuss these and other key issues:
- The impact of Wayfair on state sales tax regulations and key takeaways for tax professionals
- Impact on service providers, including providers of IT products and services
- Recent state tax law developments on economic nexus
- Challenging state sales and income taxation
- Available protections under Public Law 86-272, Commerce Clause, and Due Process Clause
- The argument for the undue burden on service providers in complying with tax laws of a variety of states
- Key considerations and planning strategies to minimize state tax risks
Tuesday, February 19, 2019-
Live 110-minute CPE webinar with interactive Q&A
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.