Insights: Publications Tribes Well-Equipped To Sue US For Climate-Related Harm
Oil companies are playing whack-a-mole against a new crop of lawsuits seeking relief from the impacts of climate change. While climate litigation is not new, impactful victories, such as federal regulation of greenhouse gasses resulting from the win in Massachusetts v. EPA in 2007, are few and far between. More recent climate cases filed by cities, states, fishermen and even a group of children impacted by climate change test different legal theories, such as liability under tort law (nuisance, negligence or strict liability), the Constitution (the due process clause) and the public trust doctrine.
Which claim will succeed is yet unclear; however, one group of plaintiffs missing from climate litigation that could assert unique rights in addition to the claims listed above is federally recognized Indian tribes.
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.