Insights: Publications Where Trade Secret Preemption Meets Insurance Coverage
Virtually every state has adopted the Uniform Trade Secrets Act in one form or another.
As enacted, the UTSA typically preempts “other laws of this State providing civil remedies for misappropriation of trade secrets.” This preemption provision has generated a surprising split in decisions where a party asserts claims based on confidential information that does not rise to the level of protected trade secrets. And a preemption ruling can impact an insured’s efforts to secure insurance coverage for an action involving claims alleging misappropriation of confidential information that does not constitute a trade secret.
This article analyzes the continuing judicial divide over the application of UTSA preemption to non-trade secret information, including comparing two recent district court decisions that reached opposite conclusions. It also discusses the related question of the applicability of a “trade secret” exclusion to an insured’s demand for coverage of claims based on non-trade secret confidential information. These doctrines intersect, as a preemption ruling in an underlying case can impact an insured’s request for coverage under a policy containing a trade secret exclusion.
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.