Insights: Publications Global Construction Disputes - Basics on U.S. Domestic Versus International Arbitration
American Bar Association
As U.S.-based contractors continue to expand their reach into the international construction arena, those contractors and their U.S. lawyers may find themselves in international arbitration proceedings that differ substantially from their experience with domestic arbitration. It is therefore important for construction practitioners to have a general understanding of the differences between being governed by common U.S. domestic arbitration rules and procedures (such as the American Arbitration Association’s (“AAA”) Construction Industry Rules and Procedures) versus an international tribunal (such as the International Chamber of Commerce’s (“ICC”) Rules and Procedures). Without focusing on a specific arbitration-body due to the varying procedures – which ultimately may be determined by the arbitrator – or varying laws, this article looks at some important considerations associated with international arbitration as well as how U.S. domestic arbitration and international arbitration differ.
Click VIEW ARTICLE to read the full article.
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.