With the recent accessibility of big data sets and powerful computing systems, artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used across industries to generate predictions. A human is always initially involved to program the model and determine any learning objective, but the model may evolve to generate results not foreseen by the human. If the result is new, non-obvious, and useful, should an entity be able to obtain a patent? What if no human believes that they contributed to the conception of the idea?
The Artificial Inventor Project has begun to explore the issue of AI generated innovation around the world, by filing patent applications where the only listed inventor is an AI algorithm (named DABUS). As humans begin to rely more on AI in discovery processes, these are important issues to consider sooner than later.
In addition to taking your questions, the panel will discuss:
- The current status of the Artificial Inventor Project appeals and patent applications
- Policy and legislative initiatives on AI and intellectual property
- Practical solutions for obtaining protection on AI-assisted innovations
To view the video, please click here.
Tuesday, April 27, 2021
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.