Clearing new agrochemical products and formulations from competitor IP in anticipation of commercialization can be a daunting challenge. Join Justin Krieger in exploring best practices for conducting freedom-to-operate (FTO) searches, analyzing competitor patents, and documenting non-infringement positions. The discussion will provide step-by-step guidance on how best to conduct FTO searches, analyze third party patents, and develop an action plan for commercializing new agrochemical products. The discussion will also explore mechanisms for challenging troublesome third party patents in the US Patent & Trademark Office, including Inter Partes Review (IPR), Post Grant Review (PGR) and District Court Litigation.
ACS National Meetings are where chemistry professionals meet to share ideas and advance scientific and technical knowledge. By attracting thousands of chemical professionals, the meeting provides excellent opportunities for sharing your passion for chemistry, connecting with the world’s largest scientific society, and advancing your career in this ever-changing global economy.
Thursday, August 29, 2019
San Diego Convention Center
111 W Harbor Dr, San Diego, California 92101
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.