"Protecting Knowledge Assets," International Association of Privacy Professionals Privacy.Security.Risk 2016, September 2016.
Organizations require a holistic and adaptive approach to protecting high-value knowledge assets from cradle to grave. The value of the assets and the threats they face should drive proven approaches to identification, protection, threat detection and response commensurate with value and risk. Instead, approaches are often siloed, with unrelated and disconnected processes and safeguards for personal data, trade secrets, intellectual property, records and company-confidential information, to name a few areas. This session begins with an interactive Q&A around the these issues informed by the first-year results of a major survey, then reports on the results of that survey on the practices of hundreds of organizations and then offers interactive instruction on best practices and innovative ways of keeping knowledge assets safe.
Richard May, Managing Principal, Integro
Jon Neiditz, CIPP/US, Data Governance Practice Leader, Kilpatrick Townsend
Larry Ponemon, Chairman and Founder, Ponemon Institute
Thursday, September 15, 2016
International Association of Privacy Professionals Privacy.Security.Risk 2016
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.