Just Use Soap and Water . . . . FDA Issues Final Rule on the Safety and Effectiveness of Antibacterial Soaps and Body Washes

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) issued a Final Rule last week establishing that over-the-counter (OTC) consumer antiseptic wash products[1] containing certain active ingredients are no longer generally recognized as safe and effective (GRAS/GRAE) and as a result cannot continued to be marketed.  The Final Rule applies to consumer antiseptic wash products intended to be used with water and rinsed off after use, including antibacterial soaps, hand washes and body washes.[2]  However, excluded from the Final Rule are healthcare antiseptics (80 Fed. Reg. 25,166), consumer antiseptic rubs (81 Fed. Reg. 42,912), antiseptics identified as “first aid antiseptics” and found in the 1991 First Aid Tentative Final Monograph (56 Fed. Reg. 33,644), and antiseptics used by the food industry.[3]

handwashing-banner1In the FDA’s Press Release announcing the Final Rule, the Agency noted that “[c]ompanies will no longer be able to market antibacterial washes [that contain the specific ingredients] because manufacturers did not demonstrate that the ingredients are both safe for long term daily use and more effective than plain soap and water in preventing illness and the spread of certain infections.[4]”  Janet Wookcock, M.D., director of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), noted how “[c]onsumers think that antibacterial washes are more effective at preventing the spread of germs, but [FDA has] no scientific evidence that they are any better than plain soap and water.”[5]

The Agency began to reevaluate the safety and effectiveness of certain active ingredients – e.g., triclosan and triclocarban – in 2013 after “some data suggested that long-term exposure to certain active ingredients used in antibacterial products . . . . could pose health risks, such as bacterial resistance or hormonal effects.” [6]  At that time, FDA issued a Proposed Rule requiring manufacturers to provide the Agency with additional data on the safety and effectiveness of certain ingredients, including any “data from clinical studies demonstrating that these products were superior to non-antibacterial washes in preventing human illness or reducing infection.”[7]

In the Final Rule, FDA noted that for the 19 active ingredients that were included in the Final Rule, either there was no additional data submitted since 2013, or the data submitted were “insufficient” to support GRAS/GRAE findings by the Agency.

The 19 ingredients included in the Final Rule are as follows:

  • Cloflucarban
  • Fluorosalan
  • Hexachlorophene
  • Hexylresorcinol
  • Iodophors (Iodine-containing
  • ingredients)

    • Iodine complex (ammonium ether
    • sulfate and polyoxyethylene
    • sorbitan monolaurate)
    • Iodine complex (phosphate ester of
    • alkylaryloxy polyethylene glycol)
    • Nonylphenoxypoly (ethyleneoxy)
    • ethanoliodine
    • Poloxamer—iodine complex
    • Povidone-iodine 5 to 10 percent
    • Undecoylium chloride iodine complex

  • Methylbenzethonium chloride
  • Phenol (greater than 1.5 percent)
  • Phenol (less than 1.5 percent)
  • Secondary amyltricresols
  • Sodium oxychlorosene
  • Tribromsalan
  • Triclocarban
  • Triclosan
  • Triple dye

While taking action on these 19 ingredients, FDA deferred action on three active ingredients –   benzalkonium chloride, benzethonium chloride, and chloroxylenol – “to allow for the development and submission of new safety and effectiveness data to the record for these ingredients.” [8]

According to FDA, since the Proposed Rule was issued in 2013, manufacturers started to already phase out (either by removing or reformulating) the use of certain ingredients in antibacterial washes, including triclosan.

Manufactures of antibacterial washes will have one year to remove these 19 ingredients from OTC antibacterial washes and soaps. The Final Rule becomes effective on September 6, 2017.

Download Copy

[1] According to FDA, “consumer antiseptic” is a “broad term” meant to include all types of antibacterial soaps, hand washes, and body washes used by consumers for “personal use” in the home and in certain public settings on a frequent, even daily basis. See Antibacterial Washes Final Rule, 81 Fed. Reg. 61,106, at 61,6112 (September 2, 2016).

[2] Id. at 61,6107.  With regard to antiseptics used by the food industry, FDA noted  that “[a] separate category was warranted for antiseptic wash products used by the food industry because “of [the] additional issues raised by the public health consequences of foodborne illness, differences in frequency and type of use, and contamination of the hands by grease and other oils.”   To that end, FDA plans to address OTC antiseptic products for use by the food industry in a separate future rulemaking.

[3] Id.

[4] See FDA News Release, FDA issues final rule on safety and effectiveness of antibacterial soap, available at http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm517478.htm (Emphasis added).

[5] Id.

[6] Id.

[7] Id.

[8] See Antibacterial Washes Final Rule, 81 Fed. Reg. 61,106, at 61,107.

Latest Thinking

View more Insights
Insights Center
close
Loading...
Knowledge assets are defined in the study as confidential information critical to the development, performance and marketing of a company’s core business, other than personal information that would trigger notice requirements under law. For example,
The new study shows dramatic increases in threats and awareness of threats to these “crown jewels,” as well as dramatic improvements in addressing those threats by the highest performing organizations. Awareness of the risk to knowledge assets increased as more respondents acknowledged that their