Last April, the SEC released proposed rules related to the standard of care that broker-dealers (“BDs”) owe their customers and issued proposed guidance related to the standard of care that investment advisers (“IAs”) owe their clients. The SEC has yet to finalize either proposal, but indications are that the SEC is targeting the fourth quarter of 2019 for release of both proposals. During the delay, some state regulators have grown impatient and have sought to move ahead with their own fiduciary duty frameworks. However, those efforts may be hitting some road bumps.
We have released a Legal Alert, available here (the “Alert”), that provides an overview of recent efforts by regulators and industry groups to enact stricter BD and IA fiduciary obligations, as well as a summary of the central arguments at issue in the BD-IA duty debate. As discussed in the Alert, the tension between regulators and the industry ultimately seems to stem from a disagreement regarding how much responsibility rests with investors to understand the services they are buying and the protections that are included therewith.
If you have any questions about the contents of the Alert or about the regulation of BDs and IAs generally, please feel free to contact us.
By the Investment Management and Broker-Dealer Team at Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.