On May 9, 2018, the SEC released its much-anticipated proposed rule (“Regulation Best Interest”), which is intended to set the standard of conduct for broker-dealers and displace the DOL Fiduciary Rule.As anticipated, the SEC is not proposing to hold broker-dealers and their associated persons to a fiduciary standard. Instead, Regulation Best Interest would require the broker-dealer “to act in the best interest of the retail customer at the time the recommendation is made without placing the financial interest of the broker-dealer or natural person who is an associated person making the recommendation ahead of the interest of the retail customer.” The standard of conduct will be satisfied if the broker-dealer complies with the following obligations: Disclosure Obligation. A broker-dealer or its associated person must, before or at the time of the recommendation, reasonably disclose in writing the material facts relating to the scope and term of the relationship with the retail customer and all material conflicts of interest associated with that recommendation. Examples of “material facts” include, but are not limited to, that the broker-dealer is acting in the capacity of a broker-dealer with respect to the recommendation; fees and charges that apply to the customer’s transactions, holdings, and accounts; and the type and scope of services provided by the broker-dealer. Care Obligation. A broker-dealer, when making a recommendation, must exercise reasonable diligence, care, skill, and prudence to:
- understand the potential risks and rewards associated with the recommendation, and have a reasonable basis to believe it could be in the best interest of at least some retail customers;
- have a reasonable basis to believe that the recommendation is in the best interest of a particular retail customer based on their investment profile and the potential risks and rewards associated with the recommendation; and
- have a reasonable basis to believe that a series of recommended transactions, even if in the retail customer’s best interest when viewed in isolation, is not excessive and is in the retail customer’s best interest when taken together in light of their investment profile.
- all material conflicts of interest that are associated with recommendations covered by Regulation Best Interest; and
- all material conflicts of interest arising from financial incentives associated with the recommendations.
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.