SEC Proposes Amendment to Liquidity Rule

By John I. Sanders and Lauren Henderson

On March 14, 2018, the SEC proposed an amendment to the Liquidity Rule. As adopted, the Liquidity Rule requires open-end investment companies to establish a written liquidity risk management program.[1] As part of this program funds must (i) submit position-level data to the SEC on a non-public basis each month and (ii) publicly disclose the fund’s aggregates liquidity profile on a quarterly basis by classifying securities, also called the “bucket approach.”[2] The proposed amendment replaces the bucket approach. Instead, funds will be required to discuss the operation and effectiveness of its liquidity risk management program in its annual report.[3] The SEC seeks to replace the bucket approach because classifying assets is inherently subjective and the bucket approach does not provide investors the necessary context to understand how the classification relates to the fund’s liquidity and risk management.[4] The SEC believes a narrative description in the fund’s annual report will “better inform investors of how the fund’s liquidity risk and liquidity risk management practices affect their investment.”[5] It is important to understand the practical implications of the proposed amendment on open-end investment companies. Specifically, while the proposed amendment changes the information that they must publicly disclose, it does not change the data they must report to the SEC.[6] If you have any questions about the Liquidity Rule or the proposed amendment, please feel free to contact us. John I. Sanders and Lauren Henderson are associates based in the firm’s Winston-Salem office. [1] SEC, Final Rule: Investment Company Liquidity Risk Management Programs, Release No. 33-10233, IC-32315, available at [2] Id. [3] SEC, Proposed Rule: Investment Company Liquidity Disclosure, Release No. IC-33046, available at [4] Id. [5] Id. [6] Id.; SEC Chairman Jay Clayton, Statement on Proposed Amendments to Public Reporting of Fund Liquidity Information (Mar. 14, 2018), available at

Latest Thinking

View more Insights
Insights Center
Knowledge assets are defined in the study as confidential information critical to the development, performance and marketing of a company’s core business, other than personal information that would trigger notice requirements under law. For example,
The new study shows dramatic increases in threats and awareness of threats to these “crown jewels,” as well as dramatic improvements in addressing those threats by the highest performing organizations. Awareness of the risk to knowledge assets increased as more respondents acknowledged that their