By John I. Sanders
On November 2, 2018, the SEC announced the results of its enforcement actions for fiscal year 2018 and stated its enforcement priorities for fiscal year 2019. During fiscal year 2018, the SEC brought 821 enforcement actions, returned $794 billion to investors, and obtained judgments and orders totaling $3,945 million in disgorgement and penalties.[1] Of the 821 enforcement actions, 490 were standalone cases.[2] 25% of standalone actions in 2018 related to securities offerings, while investment advisory issues and issuer reporting accounted for 22% and 16%, respectively.[3] The mix of actions reflects both new concerns (e.g., Initial Coin Offerings) and traditional focuses (e.g., investment adviser fee calculations) of the SEC. In the current fiscal year, the following five core principles will continue to guide the SEC’s enforcement actions:[4]- Focus on Main Street (i.e., unsophisticated) investors;
- Focus on individual accountability (as opposed to organizational accountability);
- Keep pace with technological change;
- Impose sanctions that most effectively further enforcement goals; and
- Assess the allocation of resources.
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.
