Biden’s Modernizing Regulatory Review – A New Paradigm?
Along with its efforts to repeal, revise and develop regulations, one of the more fundamental impacts of the Biden administration on the regulatory state may be the process of how the benefits and costs of regulations are analyzed and approved by the Office of Management and Budget’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. On January 20, 2021, the White House issued a memorandum entitled “Modernizing Regulatory Review,” which directs the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to modernize and improve regulations by ensuring the regulatory review process reflects “new developments in scientific and economic understanding, fully accounts for regulatory benefits that are difficult or impossible to quantify, and does not have harmful anti-regulatory or deregulatory effects.” (See Modernizing Regulatory Review | The White House).
This memorandum directs OMB to consult with heads of executive departments and agencies to “produce a set of recommendations for improving and modernizing” the cost/benefit analysis performed by OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. This group must consider “how the regulatory review process can promote public health and safety, economic growth, social welfare, racial justice, environmental stewardship, human dignity, equity, and the interests of future generations.” Included in the list of factors to be considered are costs that are difficult to quantify such as racial justice, stewardship, and interests of future generations. Mandating the use of these elements in the regulatory review process will be a 180 degree turn from the Trump Administration’s rejection of more amorphous costs.
Although the extent of the impact of the Executive Order is difficult to project at this stage, it is possible that this new approach will allow agencies to justify higher costs of regulations and, in turn, make new regulations based upon these new considerations more difficult to challenge based on the economic costs of the regulation.
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.