By: Jennifer Schumacher and Harrison Taylor
California non-exempt employees may have a new “regular rate of pay” following a recent California Supreme Court decision. A non-exempt employee’s “regular rate of pay” is important because it is the basis for determining the non-exempt employee’s overtime pay rate, which in most instances is 1.5 times the non-exempt employee’s “regular rate of pay.” Generally, a non-exempt employee’s “regular rate of pay” for a pay period includes the employee’s hourly wage and any nondiscretionary flat-sum bonus apportioned over the hours worked in the pay period and paid to the employee. The question before the court in Alvarado v. Dart Container Corp., was how to apportion a nondiscretionary flat-sum bonus over the hours a non-exempt employee works in a pay period. Under the Fair Labor Standards Act, the federal rule requires a flat-sum bonus to be divided by the total hours a non-exempt employee works in a pay period to determine the portion of the flat-sum bonus that is included in the non-exempt employee’s “regular rate of pay.” For example, if a non-exempt employee is paid weekly, works 50 hours (10 hours of overtime), and receives a $40 nondiscretionary bonus for the week, her “regular rate of pay” will include $0.80 ($40 divided by 50 hours) from the nondiscretionary flat-sum bonus. Declining to follow the federal rule, the Alvarado court set a new standard in California for apportioning nondiscretionary flat-sum bonuses to a non-exempt employee’s “regular rate of pay.” Now, flat-sum bonuses earned by a non-exempt employee in California will be divided only by the non-overtime hours worked by the non-exempt employee to determine the portion of the flat-sum bonus to be included in her “regular rate of pay.” Following the previous example, if a California non-exempt employee is paid weekly, works 50 hours (10 hours of overtime), and receives a $40 bonus for the week, her “regular rate of pay” will include $1.00 ($40 divided by 40 hours) from the nondiscretionary flat-sum bonus. Although the Alvarado decision will have a direct impact on employers with employees in California, it serves as a reminder to all employers that nondiscretionary bonuses of any kind must be included in the calculation of non-exempt employees’ regular rate of pay for overtime compensation purposes. Our Labor and Employment team provides a more in-depth discussion of the Alvarado case here.
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.
