Certain Mental Health/Substance Abuse Plan Provisions Raise Red Flags

The Department of Labor has provided sample mental health/substance abuse (MH/SA) plan provisions that require scrutiny to determine compliance with the federal Mental Health Parity rules (MHPAEA).  Here are some common red flags:

Pre-Authorization or Pre-Service Notification requirements

- Blanket requirements for all MH/SA services

- Review required following a certain number of days of in-patient treatment

- Medical necessity and prescription drug reviews that differ from those imposed on medical services (such as deferring to attending physicians for medical reviews but not MH/SA or requiring authorization every 90 days for prescriptions relating to MH benefits but not medical)

- Pre-notification requirements for extended out-patient visits

Fail-First Protocols

- Lack of progress with less intensive treatment required prior to intensive out-patient treatment

- In-patient SA rehabilitation is not authorized unless patient first fails with out-patient treatment

- In-patient MH treatment is not authorized unless patient first completes a partial hospitalization treatment option

Probability of Improvement

- Residential treatment is covered only if there is a likelihood it will result in measurable improvement

Written Treatment Plan Required

- Plan requires a written treatment plan for MH/SA benefits

Other

- Benefits excluded if patient fails to comply with treatment plan requirements

- Exclusion of residential level of treatment

- Geographical limitations that differ from those imposed on medical benefits

- Licensure requirements imposed for MH/SA facilities but not for medical facilities

Plans with these types of provisions should carefully compare them to the rules imposed for medical/surgical benefits to ensure compliance with the MHPAEA.  For more information, please click here to view the fact sheet released by the Department of Labor.

Latest Thinking

View more Insights
Insights Center
close
Loading...
Knowledge assets are defined in the study as confidential information critical to the development, performance and marketing of a company’s core business, other than personal information that would trigger notice requirements under law. For example,
The new study shows dramatic increases in threats and awareness of threats to these “crown jewels,” as well as dramatic improvements in addressing those threats by the highest performing organizations. Awareness of the risk to knowledge assets increased as more respondents acknowledged that their