Many states have recently enacted laws requiring insurers, and self-funded health plans, to report detailed medical information to state databases, including eligibility and medical claims data. The purpose of collecting this information in what are known as “all payer claim databases” is to find ways to control health care costs and improve outcomes. Today, in a case challenging Vermont’s law requiring self-funded health plans subject to ERISA to disclose this information, the Supreme Court, in a 6-2 decision, agreed with the Second Circuit Court of Appeals: the Vermont statute is preempted by ERISA with respect to self-funded health plans. Click here for a copy of the opinion.The Court, after noting that ERISA’s reporting, disclosure and recordkeeping requirements are extensive, and that it is the Secretary of Labor who is authorized to administer reporting requirements, concluded that “reporting, disclosure and recordkeeping are central to, and an essential part of, the uniform system of plan administration contemplated by ERISA.” Complying with varying rules in the different states would place a burden on ERISA plans. Vermont argued that its objective in compiling the data differs from the objectives under ERISA, but this did not sway the Court which found that the law represents a “direct regulation of a fundamental ERISA function.” Laws similar to Vermont’s law are on the books of many other states as well. This decision also calls into question the validity of these other similar state laws as they apply to self-insured health plans under ERISA. Nevertheless, it is possible that, in light of this decision, the Department of Labor may collaborate with states to require more detailed reporting in the future that can be used for these purposes, as suggested by Justice Breyer in his concurring opinion.
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.