As background, the employer penalty regulations provide that coverage under an employer plan is affordable to a particular employee if the employee’s “required contribution” to the plan does not exceed 9.5% of the employee’s income for the year. However, the regulations are unclear as to what is included in the “required contribution” when it comes to wellness surcharges and penalties.As an initial matter, because the affordability test looks to the annual premium paid for employee-only coverage, surcharges not related to employee-only coverage are disregarded. For example, a typical spouse/partner surcharge should be excluded from the affordability calculation. Further, a wellness surcharge relating to a spouse or a partner should also be excluded from the affordability calculation. However, this leaves open whether a wellness surcharge related to the employee is considered in determining affordability. Based on a pre-release of guidance that will be issued on May 3rd, wellness plan surcharges must be included in the premium calculation for affordability, EXCEPT for the following two types of surcharges: 1. Surcharges based on smoking cessation that are part of a wellness plan arrangement (that satisfies the wellness plan rules) can be excluded from the annual premium calculation for purposes of affordability. In other words, the premium that applies to non-tobacco users is used for testing affordability for all employees regardless of tobacco use. 2. For any plan year beginning prior to January 1, 2015 (e.g., the 2014 calendar year), surcharges for any wellness plan arrangement (that satisfies the wellness plan rules) can be excluded from the annual premium calculation for purposes of affordability, but only to the extent of the terms of the wellness arrangement in effect on May 3, 2013. This transition rule applies to both current employees and employees hired after May 3, 2013. Link to Official Proposed Regulations
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.