Over the last few days, both the Senate and the House passed the so-called “fiscal cliff” legislation, and the President intends to sign the legislation. The legislation does make a few changes regarding health and welfare benefits as follows:1. Makes permanent the higher deduction limits for dependent care FSAs for employees with disabled and full-time student spouses. This means that there will be no change on this issue from 2012. 2. Extends mass transit parity through the end of 2013. As you may recall, mass transit parity expired at the end of 2011. For 2013, this means that the mass transit limit will be $240 per month, subject to inflation adjustments by the IRS. The $240 monthly limit may still be increased by the IRS for 2013. The IRS has not yet issued its normal inflation adjustments for the 2013 calendar year, as the IRS has been waiting on the outcome of the fiscal cliff legislation. We expect the IRS to issue any inflation adjustments in the coming weeks. In addition, the legislation also extends mass transit parity for 2012 as well. It’s unclear how the extension for 2012 could be retroactively administered, and further guidance by the IRS on this issue is expected.
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.