As I noted during Friday's post, the agencies announced additional SBC guidance will be forthcoming. Ever coy about release dates, the agencies did not happen to say that the release date was right after our Friday meeting! DOL released the updated guidance in the form of additional FAQs and updated SBC templates. One of the more shocking issues addressed in this new guidance is relaxed electronic disclosure requirements. Specifically, the updated guidance provides that SBCs may be provided electronically to participants and beneficiaries in connection with their online enrollment or online renewal of coverage under the plan. SBCs also may be provided electronically to participants and beneficiaries who request an SBC online. In either case, the individual must have the option to receive a paper copy upon request. For new enrollees, the final SBC regulations had already adopted what I refer to as the "postcard" method from the comments I submitted to DOL on electronic disclosure last year. This new guidance now moves the needle closer to the postcard method for existing participants as well, at least for SBCs anyway. The updated guidance can be found at http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.