Andrew Saul focuses his practice on patent infringement litigation.
Mr. Saul worked as a summer associate for the firm in 2015. During law school, he served as an Articles Editor for the Georgia Law Review, worked as a legal intern at the UGA Technology Commercialization Office, and was Vice President of the UGA Intellectual Property Law Society. He also served as the student representative to the American Intellectual Property Law Association and was nominated by his professors as a Pupil in the Atlanta Intellectual Property Inn of Court.
Prior to joining the legal profession, Mr. Saul was a consultant in the telecommunications industry performing software development and data analysis for four major U.S. and international clients.
University of Georgia School of Law, J.D. (2016) cum laude
Georgia Institute of Technology, B.S., Electrical Engineering (2010) with highest honors
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (2017)
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (2017)
Georgia Supreme Court (2017)
Georgia Court of Appeals (2017)
Georgia Superior Court (2016)
State Bar of Georgia, YLD Intellectual Property Law Committee, Chair
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.