Wade Kirshy's practice focuses on patent prosecution and strategic patent portfolio development and counseling. Mr. Kirshy has also done significant work in the areas of patent litigation and IP transactions. Mr. Kirshy has represented clients in a variety of technology areas, including the electronics, software, thin-film battery, mechanical systems and medical device industries, among others.
Prior to joining the firm, Mr. Kirshy worked as an associate for a large international law firm where he represented clients in the areas of patent prosecution, patent litigation and IP transactions.
Defending United Airlines in patent infringement case where MacroSolve has accused the United Airline’s use of a mobile services network platform and corresponding date processing systems, and, in particular, the mobile application “United Airlines Mobile app.” of infringing one or more claims of the ‘816 patent. (Judge Leonard Davis).
MacroSolve, Inc. v. United Airlines, Inc., No. 11-694 (E.D. Tex. filed Dec. 21, 2011).
Representing Leatt Corporation in the Central District of California. Atlas Brace Technologies filed an action in the Central District of California for declaratory judgment against Leatt to determine infringement of Leatt’s two patents directed to protective neck braces, which prevent injury to athletes performing in various sports, including motocross. Leatt filed counterclaims for infringement of the two patents against Atlas Brace’s protective neck brace, the Atlas Neck Brace, which is also used by motocross and other athletes.
Atlas Brace Technologies USA LLC v. Leatt Corp., et al. No. 11-09973 (C.D. Cal. filed Dec. 1, 2011).
University of Maryland School of Law, J.D. (2008) The Journal of Business and Technology Law, Associate Editor
Union College, B.S., Electrical Engineering (2004) magna cum laude
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (2015)
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.