Zac Kelton focuses his practice on domestic and international patent prosecution and counseling. He is a registered patent attorney and regularly drafts and prosecutes patent applications before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. His technical experience broadly covers many electrical, software and mechanical areas, including haptic effects, healthcare IT, image processing, internet applications, mobile applications, medical devices, hydrocarbon extraction, consumer products, water purification, predictive modeling and autonomous vehicles.
Mr. Kelton worked with the firm as a summer associate in 2012. While attending law school, he was the Executive Online Editor of the Wake Forest Law Review and a member of the Wake Forest Intellectual Property Student Association.
Wake Forest University School of Law, J.D. (2013) cum laude, Order of the Coif
Brown University, M.S., Electrical Engineering (2010)
University of New Hampshire, B.S., Electrical Engineering (2008) magna cum laude
North Carolina (2013)
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (2013)
North Carolina Bar Association, Member
American Bar Association, Member
Sigma Xi Scientific Research Honor Society, Member
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.