Alicia Grahn Jones concentrates her practice in the areas of trademark clearance, prosecution, global portfolio strategy and trademark enforcement. Alicia specializes in strategic management of large global trademark portfolios. Alicia also has extensive experience representing clients before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
Alicia is a past President of the Board of Directors for the Georgia Association for Women Lawyers and also serves on the Board of Directors of the Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund. Alicia was listed in the 2019 and the four immediately preceding editions of World Trademark Review 1000 – The World's Leading Trademark Professionals. Alicia has been recognized as a Top 100 Georgia "Super Lawyer" and a Top 50 Women Georgia "Super Lawyer" in 2017 and 2018, a Georgia "Super Lawyer" for Intellectual Property in 2018 and the three years immediately preceding. She was honored as one of Georgia's "Rising Stars" by The Daily Report at its 2017 Professional Excellence Awards event. Alicia is a member of the Intellectual Property Section of the Georgia Bar Association and the National Association of Collegiate Directors of Athletics.
Alicia was presented with the Visionary Award in 2014 by the Georgia Association for Women Lawyers (GAWL) and was a recipient of the 2013 Volunteer of the Year Award from Georgia Asylum and Immigration Network (GAIN). Alicia is a Co-Chair of the firm’s Women’s Initiative. Alicia earned her J.D. from Emory University School of Law and received her Bachelor of Arts from George Washington University, where she graduated cum laude in Political Science.
Represents Energizer, the world famous manufacturer of batteries, in connection with its global trademark portfolio, including clearance, prosecution, and maintenance.
Represents a California-based Fortune 500 multinational corporation that designs and manufactures consumer electronics and computer software products in trademark enforcement work, including lead counsel representation of client in multiple proceedings before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
Successfully represented Texas Tech University in litigation to protect its school colors and trademarks. The firm’s motion for summary judgment resulted in the court finding liability as a matter of law, and also awarding more than $3 million in damages and attorneys’ fees. Texas Tech Univ. v. Spiegelberg, 461 F. Supp. 2d 510 (N.D. Tex. 2006).
Successfully represented University of Kansas in a trial against JoeCollege.com, a retailer selling various apparel using colors and other indicia of the University. Obtained award of attorneys' fees. University of Kansas v. Larry Sinks, et al., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23765 (D. Kan. 2008).
Insights View All
Emory University School of Law, J.D. (2004)
George Washington University, B.A., Political Science (1999) cum laude
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Georgia Supreme Court
Georgia Superior Court
Georgia Lower Courts
Georgia Association for Women Lawyers, President (2016-2017)
Georgia Bar Association, Intellectual Property Section, Member
National Association of Collegiate Directors of Athletics, Member
Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund, Board of Directors
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.