607 14th Street, NW Suite 900, Washington, DC USA 20005
Sam Hayim focuses his practice on patent counseling and prosecution in the software and electronic arts, in particular software development frameworks, control systems, and telecommunications.
Sam joined the firm as a law clerk in September of 2016 after spending the summer as a summer associate. He worked on patent prosecution in the software and electrical arts while attending law school.
Prior to joining the firm, Sam was Patent Examiner at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in Alexandria, Virginia for more than seven years where he assessed patent applications within the software and electrical engineering fields.
Sam was recognized as a 2019 Washington D.C. “Rising Star” for Intellectual Property by Super Lawyers magazine.
Insights View All
Publications
Publications
Georgetown University Law Center, J.D. (2017)
University of Arizona, B.S., Computer Engineering, Minors in Mathematics and Electrical Engineering (2008)
District of Columbia (2017)
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (2016)
American Bar Association (2015)
American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA), Member (2015)
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.
