Robert Harmala focuses his practice on government relations at the federal, state and local levels. Mr. Harmala's legislative and legal experience spans a diverse array of subject areas including Native American affairs, intellectual property, international relations, appropriations, tax, the laws of the European Union, transportation, telecommunications, media and advertising.
In addition to his federal representation, Mr. Harmala also provides advocacy services to clients before the California legislature as well as other political entities in California. Mr. Harmala has practiced both in large law firms and as a sole practitioner. As a sole practitioner with an office in the Netherlands, he advised U.S. clients on the laws of the European Union as well as political intelligence on EU decision making.
Insights View All
University of Southern California, J.D. (1994)
University of California, Berkeley, A.B. (1991)
District of Columbia (1996)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (2002)
Federal District Court for the District of Columbia (2019)
Former counsel to the House Foreign Affairs Committee, International Operations Subcommittee
Philip C. Jessup Moot Court Competition, Former Member
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.