Thomas Franklin focuses his practice on patent prosecution, licensing and intellectual capital management with more than 20 years of experience with intellectual property. He is experienced in intellectual property audits, due diligence and strategic planning processes. Through an IP Asset Management plan, he tailors strategy to business goals, competitive pressures and funding constraints to leverage intangible assets with intellectual property. He uses IP protection to maintain the dominance of large companies or assist smaller enterprises who are vying to dominate. Recognized by Chambers USA, sources noted Mr. Franklin as “a brilliant and intelligent attorney who knows IP law inside out.”
Mr. Franklin's technical experience broadly covers the areas of software, blockchain technology, Internet technology, content delivery, business methods, clean technology, circuit design, imaging arrays, cryptographic design, telecommunications, electronic design tools, wireless communications, networking and telemetry systems.
Prior to entering the field of law, Mr. Franklin spent nine years working in semiconductor fabrication facilities at the Naval Ocean Systems Center and Hughes Aircraft and several more as a senior engineer for Lockheed Martin. At Lockheed, he managed engineering projects involving the design of complex wireless data links, ASIC/FPGA design, digital circuits, satellite transponders, and encrypted data links.
Mr. Franklin has been recognized by Chambers USA in 2016, 2017 and 2018. He was listed by The Best Lawyers in America® in 2018 and the three years immediately preceding for patent law. He was recognized as an “IP Star” in 2015, 2016 and 2017 by Managing Intellectual Property magazine. Mr. Franklin is a recipient of the 2016 Client Choice Award USA & Canada from Lexology and the International Law Office. He was recognized as a top patent practitioner in 2017 and the four years immediately preceding by IAM Patent 1000. In 2017 and 2018, Mr. Franklin was listed in the IAM Strategy 300: The World's Leading IP Strategists. He was recognized as a Colorado “Super Lawyer” in 2018 and the four years immediately preceding for intellectual property by Super Lawyers magazine. The San Diego State University Alumni Association recognized and honored him with the 2014 Distinguished Alumni Award from the College of Engineering. Mr. Franklin was named a Lawyer of the Year in 2012 by Law Week Colorado. He was honored along with other Colorado Bar IP Section members, for their successful effort to bring a patent office to Denver. He was the project lead on the team that helped Denver become one of only four cities to land a new U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. He worked countless hours to fulfill his vision of multiple patent offices to improve patent quality through multiple offices that can hire the brightest and best examiners.
Insights View All
University of San Diego School of Law, J.D. (1997)
San Diego State University, B.S., Electrical and Computer Engineering (1990) summa cum laude
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (1998)
U.S. Supreme Court
Colorado Bar Association, Member
American Bar Association, 103 Committee, Special Subcommittee on Patent Quality, Vice-Chair
San Diego State University, College of Engineering, Advisory Board Member
DaVinci Institute, Futurist Think Tank, Advisory Board
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.