Forrest focuses his practice on trademark and commercial litigation. He has represented Fortune 500 companies in dozens of litigations in both state and federal courts, and at both the trial and appellate level. Forrest is experienced in taking expert and corporate depositions, drafting pleadings and dispositive motions, and arguing motions in court.
Forrest also manages a nationwide trademark enforcement program for a famous athletics brand that targets brick-and-mortar infringements, as well as an international domain name enforcement program for a large travel company. In connection with his enforcement work, Forrest is comfortable negotiating with represented and unrepresented infringers, as well as running UDRP proceedings.
Represented adidas in obtaining a preliminary injunction in trademark case against Skechers USA, Inc. in the District of Oregon, and later in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Forrest spearheaded adidas’s preliminary injunction, summary judgment, trial, and appellate briefing in this case involving adidas’s Three-Stripe Mark and Stan Smith trade dress. He also drafted discovery, including third-party discovery, and assisted with deposition and hearing preparation.
Represented technology company in defeating a motion for preliminary injunction in trademark case brought by eyewear manufacturer in the District of Minnesota. Forrest helped draft the client’s preliminary injunction briefing in this case.
Represented weapons manufacturer in defeating appeal brought by competitor in trademark case in the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Forrest helped draft appellee’s response brief in connection with this case.
Represented UPS in obtaining summary judgment and defeating appeal in trademark case brought by Progressive Distribution Services, Inc. in the Eastern District of Michigan, and later in the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. Forrest helped draft UPS’s summary judgment and appellate briefing in this case involving UPS’s ORDERLINK mark.
Represented Yahoo in defending against breach of contract claims brought by Mozilla Corporation in California state court. Forrest took expert and corporate depositions, drafted dispositive motions, and prepped corporate executives for depositions in connection with this case.
Insights View All
Emory University School of Law (2014) Law
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Bachelor of Music (2011)
New York (2021)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama - Honorable C. Lynwood Smith, Jr. (Aug 2014-Aug 2015)
Emory Law Journal, Former Notes and Comments Editor
Stonewall Bar Association, Former Student Member
UNC Arts Steering Committee, Former Member
Crayons2Calculators, Board of Directors, Former Member
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.