Insights: News Releases Client Success: Thinking Outside the “Bag” Leads to Victory in China.
In January 2010, a global handbag and accessory brand (“The Brand”) filed a trademark application in China to protect its mark for use in connection with handbags.
To set the stage for this story, we note that China is an important jurisdiction for global brand owners to secure protection. China is a “first-to-file” country, meaning that generally, only registered trademark rights are recognized and enforceable against third parties. While many jurisdictions around the world have a similar trademark system, securing protection in China is particularly critical given the jurisdiction’s historically rampant counterfeiting problem. Since brand owners need a registration in China to protect against counterfeiters, trademark-squatters in China have developed a practice of filing trademark applications for up and coming brands with the intention of selling the applications back to the owner for a hefty premium. These squatters are basically extorting brand owners and there is little a brand owner can do absent paying off the squatter.
Regarding the application in question, the Chinese Trademark Office rejected The Brand’s application in late 2010 based on an idiosyncratic provision in local trademark law prohibiting trademark registration of religious terms. The Brand’s prior trademark counsel advised to abandon the application in China and that’s what occurred.
About a year later, The Brand engaged Kilpatrick Townsend to take over its global trademark portfolio. The firm team handling the matter at the time was Marc Lieberstein, Jill Tomlinson, former partner, Linda Du, and former associate, Lindsay Victor.
The team reviewed our new client’s portfolio, identified a huge gap in protection in China, and constructed a creative plan to garner some protection for The Brand in China, including filing for a misspelling of its mark to avoid a religious refusal.
In the interim, an infamous trademark-jacker (“Third Party X”) in Hong Kong filed several applications for our client’s marks, including an application incorporating elements of The Brand’s logo.
Our client subsequently filed applications for its trademark and attempted to negotiate a purchase of the Third Party X’s prior filed applications. The initial offer was $1 million.
As soon as Third Party X caught wind of the fact that The Brand was considering purchasing its applications, it upped the ante by filing for a misspelled version of The Brand’s trademark.
Our client was backed into a corner, but the Kilpatrick Townsend team (adding associate Tina Mepani at this stage) stepped in and came up with a creative registration strategy that, if successful, would avoid having to pay Third Party X anything. Specifically, the firm recommended filing for the misspelling, filing for a copyright registration for its iconic design, and opposing Third Party X’s applications on the basis that they were filed in bad faith.
The plan was implemented and the firm was able to successfully stop Third Party X’s prior bad faith applications from registering. Moreover, Kilpatrick Townsend was able to altogether cancel Third Party’s registration for The Brands’ misspelling along with the design on the basis that it owns a copyright registration in the design. By clearing up Third Party X’s bad faith applications and registration, The Brand’s mark was able to mature to registration.
With creative legal thinking and persistence, the firm team was able to get an excellent result for a client that gave up on securing important protection in China years ago.
For more information, please contact John Page, firstname.lastname@example.org.
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.