Insights: News Releases Kilpatrick Townsend Adds Attorney Kimberly Scott to Firm’s Atlanta Office
ATLANTA (April 11) – Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton announced today the addition of Kimberly Scott to the firm’s Atlanta office. Ms. Scott joins the firm as an associate on the Global Sourcing and Technology Team in the firm’s Corporate, Finance & Real Estate Department.
Prior to joining the firm, Ms. Scott was an associate in the Atlanta office of an international law firm. She focuses her practice on outsourcing agreements, technology licensing, and contracts and commercial agreements. Ms. Scott has experience representing clients on a variety of syndicated finance and corporate lending matters with a primary emphasis on life science and healthcare institutions.
Mr. Scott earned her J.D. from the University of Georgia School of Law, magna cum laude, where she was an Editorial Board member and Notes Editor of the Georgia Law Review. She received her B.S. in Chemical Science with a minor in Biology from Florida State University, cum laude.
For more information about Kilpatrick Townsend, please visit: www.kilpatricktownsend.com.
Follow the firm on Twitter: @KTS_Law.
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.