Insights: News Releases Kilpatrick Townsend Attorneys Featured Panelists at the American Bar Association’s 2016 Women in Insurance Networking Meeting
Mary Craig Calkins, Heather Habes, and Helen Michael Serve as Moderators and Speaker at Event
LOS ANGELES & WASHINGTON, DC (October 25) – Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton announced today that attorneys Mary Craig Calkins, Heather Habes, and Helen Michael recently served as moderators and speaker at the American Bar Association’s (ABA) 2016 Women in Insurance (WIN) Networking Meeting held in Washington, D.C. on October 20, 2016.
Mary Craig Calkins led the panel, "Been There, Done That! Now What Else Shall I Do?" This panel of established women attorneys discussed alternatives to traditional practice with a firm, such as acting as mediators/arbitrators, becoming a broker, going in-house, or pursuing other alternatives to your practice including government service. In addition, the panel discussed recent national studies reporting on implicit bias, issues affecting women in the workplace, and the resulting impact on compensation, partnership issues, and business development.
Heather Habes moderated the panel, "Coverage Across Borders: International Insurance Claims." The panel, including an in-house counsel of an international relief nonprofit company, discussed the insurance coverage necessary to protect against international risks. The panel also addressed the importance that counsel understand local insurance requirements, admitted/non-admitted insurance, and the operation of local and master policy, and offered advice on handling coverage disputes related to international claims, how to defend a claim with foreign defense counsel, bridge information and language gaps, and ways to handle cases pending in courts abroad.
Helen Michael joined industry leaders and spoke on "Statutory Damages: The Murky Void Between Compensation and Punishment." In an era when high-risk class actions seeking statutory damages are increasingly being filed for violations of privacy rights and related offenses, the panelists discussed the complex issues surrounding whether such statutory remedies constitute “damages” under general liability or “loss” under errors and omissions liability directors and officers liability policies and cyber policies. The panel also recommended strategies for navigating coverage disputes involving such claims, including those addressing the interplay between class action and other underlying liability and insurance coverage principles in these coverage disputes, as well as the insurance industry’s attempt to curb exposure through new policy language.
Kilpatrick Townsend has been a sponsor of the ABA Section of Litigation’s Women in Insurance since its inaugural conference in October 2012. WIN’s goal is to combine first-class substantive programming with women’s networking opportunities. Like past conferences, this conference drew more than 100 attendees from around the country, including in-house risk management, claims professionals, mediators and counsel for both policyholders and insurers. For more information about the meeting, please click here.
Follow the firm on Twitter: @KTS_Law.
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.