Insights: News Releases Kilpatrick Townsend Elects Mark Mathison to Partner
Partnership Effective January 1, 2016
WALNUT CREEK (January 6) – Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton announced today the election of Mark P. Mathison, P.E. to its partnership effective January 1, 2016.
Mr. Mathison is resident in the firm’s Walnut Creek office and is a member of the firm’s Electrical Engineering and Software Team. He focuses his practice on foreign and domestic patent prosecution and counseling for electronics, electromechanical devices, and mechanical technologies as well as software, Internet, network, e-commerce, and other computer-related technologies. Mr. Mathison’s legal experience includes drafting and prosecuting patent applications, analyzing patentability and freedom-to-operate issues, and performing patent infringement analyses of competitors' products.
Prior to his legal career, Mr. Mathison worked eight years as an aeronautical and electrical engineer at Raytheon Missile Systems/Integrated Defense Systems in Massachusetts, Arizona, and California. He holds a private pilot’s license and is licensed by the State of California as a Professional Engineer (P.E.) in electrical engineering.
Follow the firm on Twitter: @KTS_Law.
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.