Insights: News Releases Kilpatrick Townsend’s Jon Neiditz Featured Panelist at The 2015 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems
ATLANTA (June 3) -- Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton announced today that Partner Jon Neiditz is a featured panelist at the 2015 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems. The conference is being held June 1 - 5, at the Westin Atlanta Airport Hotel.
Mr. Neiditz will join Nader Nassar, Master Inventor & Senior Software Engineer, Innovations for Security, CIO Lab, IBM; Peter Allor, Critical Infrastructure Group – IBM Security Systems; and Mohamed Shehab, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, on a panel titled, “Privacy Challenges and Opportunities in Collaboration Systems.”
Mr. Neiditz leads the Big Data, Privacy and Cybersecurity practice at Kilpatrick Townsend, a firm that has become one of the leading information law firms in the world.
If you want to see how collaboration technologies are drawing the line between sharing on the one hand and surveillance and stalking on the other, check out: http://datalaw.net/sharing-surveillance-stalking-drawing-the-line-to-save-the-internet
For more information about Kilpatrick Townsend, please visit: www.kilpatricktownsend.com.
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.