Insights: News Releases Kilpatrick Townsend Adds Attorney Sameer Vadera to Firm’s Washington, DC Office
WASHINGTON, DC (May 20) – Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton announced today the addition of Sameer Vadera to the firm’s Washington, DC office. Mr. Vadera joins the firm as an associate on the Electronics/Software Team in the firm’s internationally recognized Intellectual Property Department.
Prior to joining the firm, Mr. Vadera was an associate at Staas & Halsey LLP. He will focus his practice on patent prosecution in a range of technical areas. Mr. Vadera has experience prosecuting patent applications relating to various technologies including image processing, robotics and wireless technology. Previously, he served as a judicial law clerk to the Honorable Lori Joy Eisner at the General Master’s Office of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland.
Mr. Vadera earned his J.D. from the University of Maryland School of Law, where he served as the Articles Editor for the Maryland Law Review. He received his M.S. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Southern California and his B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the University of California, Irvine.
For more information about Kilpatrick Townsend, please visit: www.kilpatricktownsend.com.
Follow the firm on Twitter: @KTS_Law.
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.