Insights: News Releases Kilpatrick Townsend Adds Arjun Rangarajan in San Diego
SAN DIEGO (March 12) – Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton announced today the addition of Arjun Rangarajan to the firm’s San Diego office. Mr. Rangarajan joins the firm as an associate on the Software and Electrical Engineering Team in the firm’s internationally recognized Intellectual Property Department.
Mr. Rangarajan focuses his practice on patent preparation, prosecution, and related counseling with a concentration in semiconductor and computer network technology. Prior to joining private practice, Mr. Rangarajan was a Patent Engineer with Qualcomm.
Mr. Rangarajan earned a J.D., from the UCLA School of Law where he served as Co-Chief Articles Editor of the UCLA Journal of Law and Technology. He worked as a judicial extern for the Honorable Patricia D. Benke of the California Court of Appeal for the Fourth District. Mr. Rangarajan received his Master of Science in Electrical Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and Bachelor of Technology in Metallurgical Engineering from Indian Institute of Technology Madras in Chennai, India.
Follow the firm on Twitter: @KTS_Law.
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.