Insights: News Releases Kilpatrick Townsend Adds Yin Cheung in Seattle
SEATTLE (January 7) – Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton announced today the addition of Yin Cheung to the firm’s Seattle office. Ms. Cheung joins the firm as an associate on the Software and Electrical Engineering Team in the internationally recognized Intellectual Property Department.
Ms. Cheung is a registered patent attorney and focuses her practice on patent preparation, prosecution, and related counseling with a concentration in computer technologies, mechanical inventions and medical devices. Prior to entering private practice, Ms. Cheung spent five years as a senior software engineer at Siebel Systems.
Ms. Cheung earned a J.D., from University of Washington School of Law. While in law school, she served as an extern for the Honorable James L. Robart of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington. Ms. Cheung received her Masters of Science in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and her B.A., magna cum laude, in Computer Science and Economics from Wellesley College.
Follow the firm on Twitter: @KTS_Law.
###
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.
