Insights: News Releases Kilpatrick Townsend Elects New Partners in Atlanta
Partnership Effective January 1, 2015
ATLANTA (January 13) – Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton announced today the election of three new members of the Atlanta office to its partnership effective January 1, 2015.
Each new Kilpatrick Townsend partner is listed below along with the team in which they practice.
- Charles Hooker is a member of the firm’s Trademark and Copyright Team. He focuses his practice on intellectual property litigation, including cases involving trademarks, unfair competition, copyrights, and Internet disputes.
- Bob Stupar is a member of the firm’s Real Estate Finance & Capital Markets Team. He concentrates his practice on lending and servicing of commercial real estate conduit and balance-sheet loans secured by apartment buildings, shopping centers, strip malls, hotels, warehouses, residential developments, office buildings, and other types of commercial real estate.
- Daniel Swaja is a member of the firm’s Construction & Infrastructure Team. He devotes his practice to construction litigation, contract negotiation, government contracting and construction and engineering claims avoidance.
Follow the firm on Twitter: @KTS_Law.
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.