Jon Neiditz presented Planning for The Three Internets with two other attorneys at the International Privacy + Security Forum. The presentation description is below.
The world has at least three internets, each associated with different cultural and legal frameworks of cybersecurity and data protection. The Chinese framework begins with “cyber-sovereignty,” the power of the Chinese state to control data in-country and crossing its borders, including personal data, trade/state secrets, and political/cultural issues. Europe — recently ascendant — begins with personal data protection. The U.S. invented the insecure internet, but is now reevaluating with the move to 5G and the vulnerabilities of the IoT, and needs to look both ways, as well as toward other attackers and protection frameworks. During this session, panelists will address the world’s three internets, and will provide practical lessons for companies trying to craft responsive strategies and policies that comply with these different global regulatory approaches.
Friday, April 5, 2019-
Friday, April 5, 2019
The Marvin Center
800 21st Street NW
Washington, DC 20052
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.