"Copyrights and Wrongs: Reforming Copyright Overreach," Moderator, 2016 Legal Frontiers in Digital Media, A Joint Conference of Media Law Resource Center and The Berkeley Center for Law & Technology, May 2016.
Copyright law is increasingly being used – contrary to its intended purpose of incentivizing works of creation by authors and artists -- by aggrieved persons wishing to remove negative or embarrassing content about them from the internet. While Section 230 and strong First Amendment protections obviate many avenues available to plaintiffs, copyright law – be it threatened or actual litigation, and/or DMCA takedown notices -- is often the strongest weapon in the toolbox for those seeking to block or remove unflattering criticism, political speech, photos, and reviews. This panel will examine the problem of copyright overreach, the limitations of the current laws' ability to deter inappropriate enforcement of copyright claims, and explore the pros and cons of various proposals to reform the law, such as a federal anti-SLAPP statute applying to copyright cases, s. 512(f) reform and restrictions on the assignment of copyrights.
For more information and to register, please click here.
Thursday, May 19, 2016
A Joint Conference of Media Law Resource Center and The Berkeley Center for Law & Technology
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.