"Recent Decisions Impacting Patent Eligibility Under Alice," WIPLA CLE Event, November 2016.
The law of patentable subject matter under the Supreme Court’s Alice and Mayo decisions has been a moving target, often frustrating to understand and apply. Recent Section 101 decisions by the Federal Circuit – including EnFish, Bascom, CellzDirect, McRo, and Amdocs – have provided some more specific guidance, shaping the contours of subject matter eligibility. We will discuss these recent decisions and related Patent Office recommendations, with an eye to how the Court’s apparent course affects both patent prosecution and litigation strategies.
Monday, November 21, 2016-
WIPLA CLE Event
Ricoh Americas Holdings, Inc.
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.