Insights: Alerts 4 Top Takeaways: Smart Prosecution for Value
Kilpatrick Townsend Partners Eugenia Garrett-Wackowski, Paul Haughey, Babak Kusha, and Karam Saab recently presented on issues and strategies to consider when writing and prosecuting patent applications to withstand Alice challenges; to withstand post-grant challenges; using examiner interviews, accelerated examination, and Track 1 filings to expedite prosecution and allowance; and applying data tools to understand examiner tendencies.
Four top takeaways from the discussion, include:
Invest effort up-front in drafting applications to withstand Alice rejections.
- Frame with non-generic technology and use product-specific boilerplate.
- Use patent classifier tools to help structure application and select right terminology.
- Model claims based on USPTO examples of patent-eligible subject matter.
- Coach inventors to explain inventions from back-end rather than user-interface aspects.
Invest in quality applications to survive post grant challenges.
- Do patentability search.
- Consider putting articles on commercial success in record without a declaration.
- Avoid financial terms to avoid a Covered Business Method, particularly in independent claims.
- Include a lot of claims with a variety of terms, scope, and unusual terminology not easily found in prior art.
Consider expedited examination.
- Consider Track 1 Prioritized Examination or Patent Prosecution Highway. The up-front costs are usually covered by reduced and faster prosecution.
- Don’t use Accelerated Examination - costly, must discuss search results, and rarely used.
- Consider First Action Interview Pilot, and possibly combine with Track 1. Also, consider After Final Consideration Pilot.
- For design patent, use Design Patent Rocket Docket.
Invest time in getting to know your examiner and talking with him/her.
- Review your examiner’s statistics and career track ahead of your first interaction, include primary and supervisory examiners as needed.
- Develop a relationship with the examiner, especially if multiple cases in front of him/her.
- Use in-person, video-conference, or phone call-based interviews in that order.
- Use examiner statistics to assess how aggressive to be on continuations.
Related People View All
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.