Insights: Alerts NLRB Issues Joint Employer Decision Potentially Affecting Franchisors
Under the previous standard, a company such as a franchisor could be a joint employer if it had direct and immediate control over working conditions. Under the standard announced yesterday, a company such as a franchisor can be a joint employer if it has indirect control over working conditions or reserves the right to exercise that authority.
The NLRB opinion does not specify exactly how much indirect control is required to constitute a joint employer relationship. The board suggested the facts and circumstances of each case must be examined individually.
Concerns have been raised that this decision may affect the franchise model, which traditionally relies on franchisees' ability to supervise their own employees. Among other potential consequences, the prospect of joint employer status will presumably lead to efforts in future lawsuits to hold franchisors (with their generally deeper pockets) liable for the acts and omissions of their franchisees' employees.
The NLRB decision is appealable so there will likely be more to this story in the coming weeks and months.
To read the full case opinion, please click here.
Related People View All
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.