Sort the Following Results By:

Daicel v. Celanese
Counsel for patentee Celanese in five inter partes review petitions filed by competitor Daicel challenging validity of Celanese patents related to more
In re Certain Electronic Devices *
Represented Respondent Samsung against Complainant Ericsson in patent infringement and importation investigation related to smartphones, more
Counseling for environmental control company *
Counseled environmental control company with $50 million in annual revenue on a range of intellectual property portfolio, strategy and enforcement more
Won competitor-on-competitor patent litigation over atomization devices *
Defended ScentAir against competitor Prolitec in E.D. Wisconsin patent infringement case filed in 2012 related to commercial scent diffusion products  more
Cargill, Inc. v. Canbra Foods Ltd., Dow Agrosciences Canada Inc., and Dow Agrosciences LLC. *
Represented plaintiff-patentee Cargill in complex Markman hearing and jury trial in D. Oregon (2003) related to high stability canola oil, more
In re Certain Wireless Headsets
Lead counsel for respondents Sennheiser electronics & Co. GmbH and Sennheiser USA in patent investigation involving Bluetooth headphones. Settled  more
In re Certain Laser Abraded Denim Garments
Defended Levi Strauss & Co. in a patent infringement and importation investigation, related to laser-fading of denim, against 17 global clothing more
In re Certain Athletic Footwear
Reebok against Respondents RBX Active in patent infringement and importation investigation related to athletic shoe sole functionality. Case

 more
In re Certain Semiconductor Devices
Defending Broadcom and its six downstream customers Technicolor, HTC, Comcast, Arista, NETGEAR, and ARRIS in patent infringement and importation more
Aevoe v. Racing Optics
Counsel for patentee Racing Optics in four inter partes review petitions filed by competitor Aevoe challenging validity of Racing Optics’ more

*Experience gained by attorney prior to joining Kilpatrick Townsend

  • Case StudyCase Study
  • FeaturedFeatured
  • Pro BonoPro Bono

Who We Are

Suite 900, 607 14th Street, NW
Washington, DC, 20005-2018
USA
t +1 202.508.5854
f +1 202.315.3108

Joshua B. Pond

Experience Highlights

In re Certain Athletic Footwear

Reebok against Respondents RBX Active in patent infringement and importation investigation related to athletic shoe sole functionality. Case more

In re Certain Semiconductor Devices
Defending Broadcom and its six downstream customers Technicolor, HTC, Comcast, Arista, NETGEAR, and ARRIS in patent infringement and importation more
Aevoe v. Racing Optics
Counsel for patentee Racing Optics in four inter partes review petitions filed by competitor Aevoe challenging validity of Racing Optics’ more
In re Certain Electronic Devices
Represented Respondent Samsung against Complainant Ericsson in patent infringement and importation investigation related to smartphones, more