Matthew M. Lubozynski

Associate

Matt Lubozynski focuses his practice on litigation matters. 

Mr. Lubozynski has extensive experience representing plaintiffs and defendants in multimillion dollar patent litigation and has done a great deal of pro bono work including serving as Guardian Ad Litem and representing prisoners within the Georgia prison system seeking habeas corpus relief.

Prior to attending law school, Mr. Lubozynski played professional baseball in the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim's minor league system. 

Professional & Community Activities

Bleckley Inn of Court, Member

Journal of Intellectual Property Law, Former Managing Editor

Education

  • University of Georgia School of Law, J.D. (2004)
    cum laude
  • University of Central Florida, B.S., Business Administration (1998)
    summa cum laude

Bar Admissions

  • Georgia (2004)
  • Florida (2006)

Admissions

  • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia

Who We Are

What fully engaged means to me:

Representing clients, the community, and the firm with integrity, commitment, and to the best of my ability day in and day out.

Suite 2800, 1100 Peachtree Street NE
Atlanta, GA, 30309-4528
USA
t +1 404.745.2582
f +1 404.541.3349

Matthew M. Lubozynski

Experience Highlights

Patent litigation for one of the world’s leading manufacturers of carpet tile
The firm served as lead counsel for a leading manufacturer of carpet tiles in four cases, consolidated for pretrial purposes, concerning the client's more
Appellate litigation win in Georgia Supreme Court
Won the overturn of a mandatory sentence of life without parole in a habeas action and defended the decision before the Georgia Supreme Court. more
Mohawk Industries Inc. and Shaw Industries Inc. v. Interface Inc.
Represented Interface Inc. in a suit filed by two competitors alleging that Interface had "falsely marked" certain carpet tiles and thus was subject more
Mohawk Industries Inc. and Shaw Industries Inc. v. Interface Inc.
Represented Interface Inc. in a suit filed by two competitors alleging that Interface had "falsely marked" certain carpet tiles and thus was subject more