We represent Ingenio, Inc. in a class action in federal district court in San Francisco (Northern District of California). The plaintiff and putative class representative sued Ingenio in California state court, alleging consumer fraud claims based on the way Ingenio allegedly marketed and sold an advertising services program, and seeking the certification of a nationwide class. We removed the case to federal court under the Class Action Fairness Act and, soon after removal, moved for summary judgment, on the ground the advertising program alleged in the complaint was actually provided by an entity other than Ingenio. The district court agreed, granted summary judgment to Ingenio, and entered final judgment. The plaintiff has appealed the district court’s judgment to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, arguing (among other things) that the district court should have granted plaintiff leave to amend his complaint to name the proper party-defendants. Long v. Ingenio, Inc., No. C 10-5761 RS (N.D. Cal. filed Oct. 11, 2011) (order granting summary judgment).

Experience Center

Match our Experience to Your Needs

Experience Highlights

Hodges v. MedAssets Net Revenue Systems LLC
Served as lead counsel to MedAssets, Inc. and one of its subsidiaries, which were sued for alleged breach of an earn-out agreement. Plaintiff alleged more
adidas America v. Nike Inc.
The firm represented adidas AG in a successful petition for inter partes review ("IPR") of U.S. Patent No. 7,347,011 assigned to Nike, Inc. more
Trade secrets litigation for a major physician staffing and placement firm in Georgia state court
The firm served as lead counsel on behalf of a major physician staffing and placement firm in an action against a competitor and former more
Design, construction, and commissioning of an off-shore oil production facility in Malaysia for worldwide oil and gas organization
Represent a worldwide oil and gas organization with respect to disputes against various EPC contractors retained to perform the design, more