Sameer Vadera is a patent attorney who focuses his practice on patent prosecution in a range of technical areas.
Prior to joining the firm, Mr. Vadera worked as an Intellectual Property Attorney at a Washington, D.C. patent law firm where he represented industry-leading clients in the prosecution of patent applications relating to a wide range of technologies, including image processing, robotics, and wireless technology. Previously, Mr. Vadera served as a judicial law clerk to the Honorable Lori Joy Eisner at the General Master’s Office of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City.
While attending law school, Mr. Vadera was an Articles Editor for the Maryland Law Review. Mr. Vadera focused his coursework on Patent Law, Copyright Law, Trademark Law, and International Intellectual Property Law. He was also a legal intern for the General Counsel of Monster Cable Products, Inc.
University of Maryland School of Law, J.D. (2010)
University of Southern California, M.S., Electrical Engineering (2014)
University of California, Irvine, B.S., Electrical Engineering (2007)
District of Columbia (2016)
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Circuit Court for Baltimore City, General Master’s Office - Honorable Lori Joy Eisner
American Intellectual Property Law Association, Member
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.